AI for Tailwind TMS. Carrier replies ranked before you look up.
You started as a carrier. Now you broker too. Tailwind runs both sides. Keelway sits on top of the broker module — reading every carrier reply to your posted loads, scoring trust against FMCSA, and ranking the top five so the decision is waiting for you, not the other way around. Accepted carrier writes back into the Tailwind order automatically.
The carrier-broker hybrid problem Tailwind doesn't solve
Tailwind is built for operations that grew from an asset-based carrier into a brokerage. The dispatch module handles your own trucks; the broker module handles the loads you post for outside carriers. It is one of the few TMSs that takes both sides of that operation seriously in a single platform, which is why it has become a default for businesses in the $2M–$30M freight range that run mixed books.
The gap is the same one every broker-module user hits: when you post a load to DAT or Truckstop through Tailwind, 30–50 carrier emails arrive in your Gmail inbox within two hours. Tailwind sees none of that. Those replies are unstructured, unranked, and land in a general inbox that already has shipper emails, dispatch threads, and accounting chains in it. Someone on your team has to dig through all of it, look up each MC, and decide who to call back.
That is the job Keelway was built for. We read the inbound Gmail stream, extract the rates, check every carrier against FMCSA, and rank them. You see the top five. You confirm the best one. It writes back into the Tailwind order. The rest of Tailwind keeps running exactly as it does today.
Why carrier-broker hybrids need stronger fraud detection
Operating both carrier and broker authority makes your operation a more attractive target for double-brokers. Outside carriers who spot your load postings know you have broker authority — which means you can be approached by re-brokers posing as asset carriers in a way that a pure-broker operation might catch faster.
Keelway runs the following checks on every inbound email before it reaches the ranked list:
- Domain vs. MC cross-check. The sending email domain is compared against the carrier domain on file at FMCSA. A carrier replying from a free Gmail or Yahoo address when their MC lists a corporate domain is flagged.
- Authority age. Carriers with operating authority under 12 months are flagged. Most legitimate carriers approaching a load-posting from a Tailwind broker have been operating for longer.
- Insurance status. Lapsed or missing cargo insurance is surfaced immediately on the trust badge, not buried in a detail screen.
- Out-of-service rate. Carriers above industry average on out-of-service inspections are marked amber regardless of their offered rate.
What Keelway adds to the Tailwind broker module
Inbound replies matched to open Tailwind loads
FMCSA trust badge on every carrier
Top five per load, keyboard-native
Accepted carrier flows into Tailwind order
A week on Tailwind + Keelway for a hybrid operation
You have 12 company trucks and broker 30–40 loads per week on top of that. On a typical Monday, 10 new brokered loads are posted to DAT. By noon, each load has 25–40 email replies. Without Keelway, the broker assigned to those loads spends most of the morning just sorting replies into a usable order.
With Keelway, the broker opens the triage screen at 9am and sees all 10 loads with their top-five carriers already ranked. Two carriers across the board are flagged — one for a domain mismatch that indicates potential double-brokering, one for an insurance lapse that the broker would not have caught until calling back. Both are automatically ranked below the legitimate carriers. The broker works through all 10 loads in 40 minutes, confirming one carrier per load, each of which writes back into the Tailwind order automatically.
The company-truck dispatch side of Tailwind is untouched. Keelway runs entirely within the broker-module surface of Tailwind — dispatchers managing company assets see none of it.
How Keelway compares for Tailwind brokers
Tailwind does not ship a native email-triage or carrier-scoring feature. If you have looked at standalone carrier vetting tools, the Parade alternative comparison covers how Keelway differs from the best-known option in that category. For the full capability set independent of TMS, see Carrier Email Automation. For brokers evaluating the broader Keelway product, the Brokers solution page covers the full decision context.
For TMS-specific comparisons, the Aljex integration page and the Tai TMS page cover similar write-back workflows for other SMB-to-mid-market broker platforms. Pricing is on the pricing page.
Frequently asked questions
What is Tailwind TMS?+
How does Keelway integrate with Tailwind TMS?+
Does Keelway work for both the carrier side and the broker side of my operation?+
Will Keelway interfere with Tailwind's existing carrier onboarding features?+
What if my carrier contacts reply by text or phone rather than email?+
How does Keelway handle the double-brokering risk that is higher in carrier-broker hybrids?+
What does Keelway cost on top of Tailwind?+
How long does deployment take?+
Rank every carrier reply before you pick up the phone.
Request accessRelated
The flagship Keelway capability — what we do for every carrier reply, independent of TMS.
Similar broker-module triage workflow for brokers on Aljex.
Write-back workflow for SMB brokerages on Tai.
How Keelway compares to Parade for carrier capacity matching.